SWSAC MEMBER AGENCIES: SLOCFC&WCD, CSA 16 (SHANDON), CMC, COUNTY OPS CENTER, CUESTA COLLEGE, CITY OF MORRO BAY, CITY OF PISMO BEACH, OCEANO CSD, AVILA VALLEY MWC, AVILA BEACH CSD, SAN MIGUELITO MWC, SAN LUIS COASTAL USD
Notice of Meeting STATE WATER SUBCONTRACTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEESAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Friday, July 1, 2022 – 10:00 to 11:30 AM County Government Center, Rm. D361 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 For agenda packet attachments and more information: https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Committees-Programs/State-Water-Project-and-Subcontractors-Advisory-Co.aspx
Chair: Ben Fine (Pismo Beach) Vice Chair: Brad Hagemann (Avila Beach CSD)
AGENDA
Attachments
CONTACT: Please contact SWSAC Secretary, Wes Thomson, with any questions: [email protected] or (805) 781-5252.
County Gov’t Center, Rm. D361 w/Hybrid Web-conference Option Friday, March 4, 2022
MINUTES (DRAFT) STATE WATER SUBCONTRACTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chairperson: Ben Fine Vice Chairperson: Brad Hagemann (absent) Secretary: Wes Thomson
The following action minutes are listed as they were acted upon by the State Water Subcontractors Advisory Committee (SWSAC) and as listed on the Regular Meeting agenda for March 4, 2022, together with staff reports and related documents attached thereto and incorporated therein by reference.
Call to order at approx. 10:00 AM; a quorum was established. B. Fine serving as chair.
B. Fine announced that The City of Pismo Beach Council approved the MOA for Central Coast Blue, and WSC is contracted for the project’s program management and design.
Committee approved January 7th meeting minutes with minor update to correctly identify member Michael Fitzpatrick on agenda items IV.F and VI.A.
A.Water Operations Report
B.Emergency Water Concept – Proposed Transfer with CCWAKate Ballantyne presented an “emergency water concept” that District staff will to the County Board during the upcoming drought update on March 15th. The transfer opportunity would consist of a water transfer to CCWA, providing them with 1,000 AF of the District’s unsubscribed water, currently stored at SLR. In exchange, CCWA would treat and deliver an additional 1,000 AF of water for the District. This transfer is being pursued as a drought mitigation strategy that will bring water into the County from other sources. There would be no financial exchange required to make the transaction, and the idea is that the water could be made available to the subcontractors or others within the County. M. Fitzpatrick asked for clarification on the benefits to CMC from this exchange. K. Ballantyne clarified that this is an opportunity for the District’s unallocated supply to be put to good use within the County in addition to fulfilling its regular delivery commitments to the subcontractors. This strategy
would allow the District to be better positioned to respond in an emergency. W. Clemens expressed his support in that this opportunity allows for more water to be taken out of SLR and used to address local needs or help agencies reduce demand on local sources. M. Fitzpatrick clarified that the water would be treated and not able to be sent to Lopez. K. Ballantyne added clarification to note that the agency that receives the water would be responsible for costs of treatment and delivery. Jeff Edwards from the public commented that there should be more than just an emergency or short-term agreement negotiated transfer since there is additional capacity that could be used to support increased deliveries to the County.
C.Review of Drought Buffer OptionsW. Thomson gave an update on drought buffer options. Drought buffer is used to secure availability of supply for local delivery contracts. Current costs are about $175/AF, which is basically covers the cost that the District pays for the unsubscribed allocation. Drought buffer contracts can be amended (increased or decreased), and they serve to secure additional supply for a subcontractor which in turn helps to address the inherent uncertainty of the SWP’s annual new water supply allocation that varies year to year. Pismo Beach mentioned their possible interest in requesting an increase in drought buffer for a term. It was clarified that a change in drought buffer requires a contract amendment and that those can be requested at any time. The cost of the drought buffer is included in the annual billings to the subcontractors, and any Delta Conveyance Project capital costs would impact the drought buffer cost. M. Fitzpatrick mentioned the concern of over committing water. W. Thomson expressed the ability to discuss this topic further offline, or at the next SWSAC meeting. As a public comment, J. Edwards supported the request of additional drought buffer by subcontractors rather than using other more costly options. K. Ballantyne confirmed that the subcontractors have the first right of refusal for the District’s unallocated water.
D.Water Management Tools Study (WMT) Study –Next StepsW. Thomson gave a brief update, noting that the District is continuing discussions with CCWA and the consultant team that supported the WMT Study to explore opportunity for a “phase two” of the WMT study.
E.Delta conveyance Project (DCP) UpdateW. Thomson reported that the draft EIR is on track to be released to the public by mid-June. Currently the project is in year 2 of 4 of the planning/design/environmental review.
F.Committee Membership UpdatesPlease contact W. Thomson is your agency would like to make any updates to committee membership; updates require about 7-8 weeks minimum to get to the Board.
SWAC Regular Meeting – May 6, 2022, at 10:00 AM. Meeting adjourned at approximately 11:02 AM.
County Gov’t Center, Rm. D361 Friday, May 6, 2022
MINUTES (DRAFT) STATE WATER SUBCONTRACTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chairperson: Ben Fine Vice Chairperson: Brad Hagemann (absent) Secretary: Wes Thomson
The following action minutes are listed as they were acted upon by the State Water Subcontractors Advisory Committee (SWSAC) and as listed on the Regular Meeting agenda for May 6, 2022, together with staff reports and related documents attached thereto and incorporated therein by reference.
Call to order at approx. 10:06 AM; a quorum was not established. W. Thomson serving as interim chair as B. Fine was absent and B. Hagemann arrived late.
Committee tabled March 4th meeting minutes approval for the July 2022 meeting.
A.Water Supply & Operations Report
Discussion –
Mike Ritter questioned the viability of long-term storage in San Luis Reservoir (SLR) given extended drought conditions. Kate Ballantyne called attention to the diversity of water supply portfolios among the subcontractors, and that each agency will need to determine the appropriate level of conservation in response to the SWP supply conditions with respect to how it fits in to the overall supply for the particular agency.
Jerry Reaugh asked about the SLR “spill” events and if that could play a factor, and W. Thomson explained that during a wet year, the District’s stored water in SLR is at risk of “spilling,” which could certainly impact District’s carryover supply conditions, but that historically, we have come out from a “spill event” in decent shape (from an overall supply standpoint) – relative to our demand/delivery capability.
Geoff English asked how the District would charge for supplemental water provided to subcontractors, if needed. W. Thomson said the District would deliver water as available to fulfill the water service amount under contract, as requested, and reimbursement for those costs would simply be per contract; there is even the potential for the district to deliver water above the water service amount, and the contract has existing provisions to address cost reimbursement for that additional supply as well.
Shirley Gibson and Michael Fitzpatrick both had loose recall of an event in the past relating to the possibility of a past DWR-coordinated SWP water transfer action with Westlands that was in conflict with SWP agreements. W. Thomson said he wasn’t familiar, but that if he was provided more details, he’d be happy to investigate it.
M. Fitzpatrick mentioned groundwater substitution transfers originating in northern California, noting the potential impact on storage at SLR and the related “spill” events. W. Thomson described the transfer process and timing and assured that DWR would not allow for the transfer if it were to limit DWR’s ability to deliver water to those who have SWP contract priorities; these transfers would not drive any spill of water held at San Luis Reservoir.
M. Fitzpatrick asked about the cost of purchasing drought buffer or increasing the amount of the base water supply contract. W. Thomson explained that currently, drought buffer contracts (about $175/AF) are the only readily available option from the District for addressing supply needs – primarily due to the limiting factors of conveyance and treatment capacity in the coastal branch system. However, it’s possible that future arrangements could become available and allow for other options.
B.Emergency Water Concept – Proposed Transfer with CCWAKate Ballantyne gave an update on the emergency water concept based on an short-term transfer with CCWA. The Board has authorized staff to develop the terms of the transfer with CCWA and Santa Barbara County, which would involve the transfer of 1,000 AF of District stored water in exchange for the District receiving the ability to take delivery of up to 1,000 AF of additional treated water (above the annual 4,830 AF contracted). CCWA is currently drafting a contract and the County is working on a process for agencies to request this water.
C.Discussion on Subcontracts and District’s Unsubscribed AllocationW. Thomson gave an update on the drought buffer option which is currently priced at $175 per AF. There was discussion on different avenues available to increase water supply within the County and maximize the use of the unsubscribed allocation available to the District.
D.Update on Contract Extension & Water Management ToolsK. Ballantyne gave an update on State Water contract extension amendment. The District is on track to bring the vote to the Board in July to extend the contract to 2085. W. Thomson and K. Ballantyne commented briefly on the water management tools, including the decision to not to move forward yet on a collaborative effort with CCWA due to different priorities.
E.Update on Delta Conveyance ProjectW. Thomson gave an update on the DCP goals and objectives. The draft EIR is close to being released. The state is currently on budget and on schedule. The cost to the County for the 2nd 2-years would be less than was estimated back in 2020, and the staff recommendation is to continue with the project, but a formal vote by the District will be held later this year.
F.Committee Membership UpdatesAn effort is underway to get the committee memberships updated.
SWAC Regular Meeting – Jul 1, 2022, at 10:00 AM. Meeting adjourned at approximately 11:10 AM.
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT STATE WATER PROJECT
TO: State Water Subcontractors Advisory Committee FROM: Wes Thomson, Utilities Division Engineer DATE: July 1, 2022 SUBJECT: SWP Water Supply Report
SWP DELIVERY REPORTAttachment 1 is the monthly summary of State Water Project (SWP) deliveries through May 2022 for the 2022 SWP “Water Year” (Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022).
2022 SCHEDULED DELIVERIES VS. STORED WATER SUMMARYAttachment 2 summarizes the current 2022 delivery schedule for District Subcontractors and reports the new supply for 2022 based on DWR’s 5% “Table A” water allocation and shows the estimated stored carryover water needed by the Subcontractors to meet requested deliveries for June through December 2022. This delivery schedule and storage analysis assumes that the 5% “Table A” allocation will hold for the remainder of the year. Note that this is the third year of drought conditions, and most of the Subcontractors have exhausted their stored water (numbers in red), and those that have not, are on track to use up most of their stored water by the end of the year (numbers highlighted in yellow).
ATTACHMENTS
Page 1 of 1
2022 STATE WATER DELIVERIES (DRAFT)-- For deliveries thru May 2022 --
Note: 1. Deliveries based on CCWA monthly delivery reporting and subcontractor request. 2. All delivery values reported are in volumetric units of acre-feet (AF).
2022 STATE WATER REQUESTS
Note: Assumes District can supply 100% of requested delivery, to meet requests that exceed current DWR allocation*. *Current DWR "Table A" allocation = 5%
STATE WATER PROJECT / San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Prepared by WT, 6/8/2022
NOTES< >Water volumes reported in units of acre-feet; delivered water based on latest DRAFT report.Stored carryover water is District water from previous years, stored at SLR, set aside informally for Subcontractors.SLR = San Luis Reservoir, a SWP storage facility.STATE WATER PROJECT / San Luis Obispo County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District Prepared by WT, 6/8/2022 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||